金融英语相关阅读指导(五)

"Growing dominance of banks" in commercial insurance

　　One can see the “growing dominance of banks” when it comes to the distribution of property and casualty (P&C) commercial insurance, observes John Wepler, president of MarshBerry (Concord, OH). Twenty-five of the top 100 U.S. insurance brokers (excluding Aon and Marsh McClennan) are now bank owned. And while this movement is likely to continue, bank executives have to be mindful of overall industry trends, he noted at the annual convention of the Bank Insurance & Securities Association (BISA) this week in Florida.

　　This is a soft P&C insurance market. Premium growth rates have been lagging since 2002, with the notable exception of storm-ravaged coastal areas. Industry-wide, P&C premium growth has fallen in the last year from 3.6 percent to about 2 percent.

　　“The premium tide is no longer rising,” says Wepler, and bank agencies are no longer looking at double-digit annual revenue growth, but more on the order of 6, 7, or 8 percent.

　　Recently, public brokers replaced banks as the top acquirers of agencies. This is more from lack of supply than from lack of demand, notes Wepler. Brokers have raised their offers compared with past years (unlike back in 1999, say, when they figured banks were over-paying and would fail in the insurance area) and have been “lightning quick” in getting deals done, often in 20-30 days, a time frame that most banks—which tend to be more deliberative——have difficulty matching. The public brokers have “outrun banks,” says Wepler.

　　There is more interest among banks in acquiring 'benefits' firms, which have generally higher profits margins than commercial lines insurance firms—31 percent versus 22 percent. And products like group health are generally less cyclical and often have good cross-selling potential compared with other insurance products. But, again, these firms are not always easy to find in the current market.