(A) The analysis of a limited number of atypical discrimination suits of little value to potential plaintiffs
(B) When the number of factors analyzed in a sex discrimination suit is increased the validity of the conclusions drawn becomes suspect
(C) Scholars who are critical of traditional legal research frequently offer alternative approaches that are also seriously flawed
(D) Outcomes analysis has less predictive value in sex discrimination cases than do certain other social science techniques
(E) Given adequate information, it is possible to predict with considerable certainty whether a plaintiff will be successful in a discrimination suit
15. It can be inferred from the author’s disccussion of traditional legal research that the author is
(A) frustrated because traditional legal research has not achieved its full potential
(B) critical because traditional legal research has little relevance to those actually involved in cases
(C) appreciative of the role traditional legal research played in developing later more efficient approaches