考试网 >> 外语考试 >> LSAT >> LSAT试题 >> TEST 3 CRITICAL REASONING 2

发布时间：2006-06-23 11:56     点击：

(E) People who set themselves goals that others denounce as overly ambitious do little to silence their critics if they say, “I can accomplish this if anyone can. “Rather, those people should either admit that their critics are right or not dignify the criticism with any reply.

16. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.

Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.

In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?

(A) Accepts Concetta’s criterion and then ads evidence to concetta’s case

(B) Discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence

(C) Rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim

(D) Disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative criterion

(E) Attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

Questions 17-18

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze On the basis of this evidence; Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

发表评论： 匿名发表 用户名: 查看评论

您将承担一切因您的行为、言论而直接或间接导致的民事或刑事法律责任 留言板管理人员有权保留或删除其管辖留言中的任意内容 本站提醒：不要进行人身攻击。谢谢配合。