GRE作文点评：看门见山式观点

　　作者暗示着具体问题具体分析，没有绝对化的界限。

　　Aside from these two qualifications, I strongly agree that it is worthwhile for college faculty to work outside academia in professional positions related to their field. There are three dear benefits of doing so. First, in my experience as a student, faculty who are actively engaged in their fields come to class with fresh insights and a contagious excitement about the subject at hand. Moreover, they bring to their students practical, real-world examples of the principles and theories discussed in textbooks, thereby sparking interest, and even motivating some students to pursue the field as a career.

　　作者联系自己的实际阐明纯理论与实践经验相结合的优势。这在美国可是司空见惯的，特别在一些名牌大学如哈佛的MBA个案分析课里，教授们几乎都是兼职于某某大型公司的CFO，CEO的。

　　Secondly, by keeping abreast with the changing demands of work as a professional,professors can help students who are serious about pursuing a career in that field to make more informed career decisions. The professor with field experience is better able to impart useful, up-to-date information about what work in the field entails, and even about the current job market. After all, college career-planning staff are neither equipped nor sufficiently experienced to provide such specific advice to students.

　　作者进一步指明有学术外工作经验的教授能够“与时俱进”，提供更新更准确的招聘需求，这一点是学校里的就业指导老师们所不能比拟的。

　　A third benefit has to do with faculty research and publication in their areas of specialty.

　　进一步阐述外界工作能够为教授们寻求研究题材找到灵感，甚至有利于个人声望的扩大。

　　小结：作者总的来说是大部分同意原文观点的。但是我觉得他在第一段的异议方面有所欠缺。没有深入发挥下去。剩下的论证都是只能算说理清晰，谈不上上上乘，但也不错啦。主要看来还是举例救了他啊。