"It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them."
题目的意思是,当今教育部门过于重视学生在课程设置中的决定作用,正确的做法是教育部门决定课程,学生的任务就是好好学习。
The statement above conceals intesting connotations far above curriculum development. Issues of classroom control and development of scholarly talents are at stake, not simply a debate over which books are acceptable or over revisionist histories.
开题表明课程设置是次要的,重要的是适当的课堂秩序以及培养学生的学术才能。这是一个典型的另起炉灶型的作文,提出issue题目中并不包含的观点。
The statement itself is a bit misleading in that in my experience, student control over curriculum hardly existed. Each year, there were certain course offerings made available, and students were to choose from those offerings, of course bearing in mind requirements for graduation set forth by the administration. On a classroom level, the immediate, initial material may have been somewhat directed by the students, but this was a part of the process allowed by the teacher/professor in order to gain the interest and attention of the students.
(以上是对issue题目中“学生对课程设置具有决定作用”presumption的否定,指出这不符合事实。)
However, too much of any one thing becomes problematic;
后半截虽长,但意思只有一个,让学生决定课程内容会造成教育质量的下降。
这一段相对比较简洁,通过举例等方式,说明学生缺乏自主决定课程设置的能力,让他们决定课程设置将使他们得不到direction and guidance.
|
您将承担一切因您的行为、言论而直接或间接导致的民事或刑事法律责任
留言板管理人员有权保留或删除其管辖留言中的任意内容 本站提醒:不要进行人身攻击。谢谢配合。 |