考试网 >> 外语考试 >> GRE >> GRE试题 >> GRE试题:GRE北美试题10

发布时间：2006-06-22 13:27     点击：

    (A) Jack

    (B) Karen

    (C) Louise

    (D) Mark

    (E) Nancy

    5. Political campaigns to win election to an office are much more costly than campaigns to retain an office. Two separate econometric studies made three years ago found that a challenger's campaign expenditures would have to exceed those of the incumbent by $200,000 to make a difference. And this is just an average figure. Since campaign expenses differ widely from election district to election district, there will be individual districts where this figure is considerable higher.

    The information above provides which of the following reasons for not placing limits on campaign spending?

    (A) Such limits undemocratically, and thus indefensibly, restrict political competition by favoring incumbents.

    (B) Such limits are currently set too high for actual campaign expenditures to be affected.

    (C) Such limits run counter to the stilit of constitutional granaries of an individual's right to act freely as long as nobody else's rights are abridged.

    (D) Such limits are determined separately for each election district on the basis of previous levels of campaign expenditures.

    (E) Such limits in no way guarantee a candidate's ability to raise as much money as he or she is entitled to raise.

    The main flaw in the reasoning in the passage above is that it

    (A) suggests that Congress revamp current income tax laws to favor married couples with two incomes

    (B) assumes that Congress intentionally penalized married couples when it required that they pay higher income taxes than single people

发表评论： 匿名发表 用户名: 查看评论

您将承担一切因您的行为、言论而直接或间接导致的民事或刑事法律责任 留言板管理人员有权保留或删除其管辖留言中的任意内容 本站提醒：不要进行人身攻击。谢谢配合。