考试网 >> 外语考试 >> GRE >> GRE指导 >> GRE作文点评：看门见山直陈观点

发布时间：2006-06-22 13:01     点击：

  　　Issue 30

　　"In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."

　　Whether college faculty should also work outside academia, in professional work related to their academic fields, depends primarily on the specific academic area.

　　看到了吗？这就是"看门见山"的直陈式观点了。没有太多的扭扭捏捏，而且也不需要。

　　With respect to fields in which outside work is appropriate, I strongly agree with the statement; students and faculty all stand to gain in a variety of respects when a professor complements academic duties with real-world experience.

　　这一段要了解的一个词：stand to = begin to come to作者在首段就点明了"个别问题个别分析对待"，但是也不能忽视practical experience对academic world的重要作用。

　　As a threshold matter, the statement requires qualification in two respects.这一句可作为自己的开头句。First, in certain academic areas there is no profession to speak of outside academia. This is especially true in the humanities; after all, what work outside academia is there for professors of literature or philosophy? Secondly, the statement fails to consider that in certain other academic areas a professor's academic duties typically involve practical work of the sort that occurs outside academia. This is especially true in the fine and performing arts, where faculty actively engage in the craft by demonstrating techniques and styles for their students.

　　在这一段里，作者就原文观点提出两点质疑，也就是：

　　1.某些学科如文学和哲学式不需要与外界紧密联系的；

　　2.但有些学科如表演艺术则要与真实实践相结合。

　　作者暗示着具体问题具体分析，没有绝对化的界限。

　

　　作者进一步指明有学术外工作经验的教授能够"与时俱进"，提供更新更准确的招聘需求，这一点是学校里的就业指导老师们所不能比拟的。

发表评论： 匿名发表 用户名: 查看评论

您将承担一切因您的行为、言论而直接或间接导致的民事或刑事法律责任 留言板管理人员有权保留或删除其管辖留言中的任意内容 本站提醒：不要进行人身攻击。谢谢配合。